Monday, June 22, 2009
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Rift in Iran's top clergy
It appears that the rift among the the top religious authorities in Iran continues to gain momentum, with the Ayatollah Khameini having to lean more and more in his enforement agencies and less in the rule of law, while his moral authority seems to be spiraling down in all but the most conservative Iranians.
According to Reuters the most senior opposition ayatollah, Hossein Ali Montazeri, distanced himself further from Iran’s supreme leader, saying that “Resisting people’s demand is religiously prohibited … I am calling for three days of national mourning from Wednesday.” and described the election results as something that “no wise person in their right mind can believe.”
Former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who leads the 86-member Assembly of Experts -a goverment body with legal authority to remove the Supreme Leader-, is supposed to be playing a quiet but critical role in organizing the opposition. His daughter Faezeh Hashemi Rafsanjani is a former member of Parliament who gained notoriety for opening sports to women and was seen at a rally for opposition candidate Mir Hussein Moussavi on June 17.
Mounting Evidence of Election Fraud
Read the analysis from Chatham House
Street Demonstrations Continue
Below is what is reported to be a demonstration in Shirazi street in Teheran from earlier today. It seems that demonstrations continue throughout Iran today, but with less violence than Yesterday in spite of the large number of police in the streets. Indeed, they are chanting "we are all together" -I wonder if we are beginning to see the turning of the enforcement agaencies -the only thing that seems to be keeping the government in place -to the reformist camp...
Here is a great blog from inside Iran, with great updates and photos
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Marg Bar Dictator
It looks like the government of Iran has but two options: become a plain dictatorship in all but name, or veer towards freedom and reform.
Here is one of the many websites following the ongoing events
Videos, photographs, and blogspostes abound. The people are leaving no room for doubt about what they want, and their willingness to pay whatever cost is necessary:
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBOBhguAjjY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t54KKSVl-c
Don't miss these revealing facts about the election results here.
Friday, June 19, 2009
A Note to Tomorrow's Children
The Ayatollah made clear where he stands -and has given a clear warning to the people and opposition leaders -but the protests will go on in a few hours. I hope the cost to the people is not too high.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Iran wants change
In 1979, the people of Iran raised up to overthrow a goverment they did not approve of. That revolution was supposed to put in place an islamic goverment, empowered by the people. But the recent and highly contested election results triggered a series of protests in which the people of Iran made clear that they did not feel empowered by their government. "It's not about Mousavi, or any candidate, it's about democracy" explained a young protester in the streets of Teheran. It seems to me, from the multiple accounts, interviews, tweets, blogs, and cell-phone videos from the streets, that the people weren't particularly upset with the system of government -at least at the beginning- they just wanted to have a say in how things are run, and they want to be able to express themselves freely -the problem is that this is a classic example of what happens when one branch of government has power over the others: the people's sovereignty soon starts to fade.
So now, with the whole world paying close attention, Iran finds itself at a fork in the road. The Supreme Leader must be thinking about what happened to the last Shah during the revolution, armed forces or not. Using force to repress the protests would discredit whatever credibility it has left before its own people and abroad, and it might backfire, triggering another revolution. He even has strong opposition within the clerical branches of government, supporting the protests. The safest way out seems to be to call for a re-election, and this time making sure it is legitimate. This of course, may weaken his position in the eyes of his opponents, and probably his own; though it seems to me that with the right moves, he could easily turn the situation to his advantage and gain popular support.
Khamenei said he would address the people tomorrow, and in the meantime, the people continue to flood the streets to make sure no one forgets what they want.
The world watches, and holds its breath.
>Al Jazeera article
>The Economist article
>Iran Timeline
Government of Iran:
Saturday, June 06, 2009
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Type selector >
Test >
This is what I got:
Your Type is INTJ
Strength of the preferences %
Introverted - 78
Intuitive - 75
Thinking - 38
Judging - 22
What did you get...?
Thursday, June 04, 2009
Tiananmen Square
On June 4th, 20 years ago, many brave people died for demanding that their voices be heard. They wanted reform, freedom, and democracy. I think that when someone takes a stand for freedom at the risk of their own lives, they not only bring honor upon themselves, but elevate all of us, as a species, and we should all be proud of them, our brothers and sisters in the human family. As a small tribute to them, I spent some time reading about, and pondering the events that took place during the weeks that culminated that night on Tiananmen square.
Two quotes in particular caught my attention:
"Whether you like or not, the events ensured 20 years of fast economic growth"
Beijing Netizen, Beijing
"June 4th was a time when a group of people sacrificed their lives for democracy. We need to remember their efforts"
Steve Chan, Hong Kong
It cannot be denied that a peaceful demonstration for freedom is an honorable action and stems from basic human rights -on this belief we should not waver. We must also consider that freedom has many dimensions; political freedom does no good if people are starving, or can't educate themselves. These too are basic building blocks of freedom. History shows that lack of stability is detrimental of economic growth, and economic growth is necessary to elevate people from poverty, to provide education, and raise standards of living. Thus, it could be argued that the violent repression of June 4th was necessary for the long-term wellfare of the people.
So the question is this: was the benefit of crushing a potential revolution enough to justify the taking of so many lives?
I suggest that before answering, you take a deep breath, close your eyes, and imagine yourself in a room large enough to contain all the mothers, fathers, children, and friends of all those who were killed -a very, very large room.
Now imagine you have to ask that question to them.
Monday, June 01, 2009
Bada BING
After brief experimentation, I have found no great performance gap between Google and Bing -Microsoft's latest Search Engine re-launch. They are marketing it as a "Decision Engine"; it is supposed to help you sort through results better by selecting more "credible" sources (better-paying sources?) I can't wait for the conspiracy theories on that.
While Bing doesn't really have more to offer than Google, it does a better job of presenting and advertising its features. Even the simple, clean-looking Google interface, one of its best liked features, looks a bit too simple after Bing's nice interactive wallpapers. I am sure that if a proper comparisson is done, Google will come out on top performance-wise, at least initially, but for the first time, Microsoft appears to have come up with a credible adversary to Google, and in view of Microsoft's past history, even mighty Google should be losing some sleep. Or has Microsoft finally met its match?
Either way, the web landscape has become a bit more interesting...